Purple candle
• 13 min read

Saturn Phases

Saturn Phases

wiki

Saturn Phases

Category: Synodic Cycles & Planetary Phases

Keywords: phases, contexts, mundane, planet, outer, saturn, natal, phase, visibility

1. Introduction

Saturn phases refer to the cycle of visibility and relative solar geometry of Saturn as it moves through its synodic relationship with the Sun and Earth. As a superior (outer) planet, Saturn completes one orbit of the Sun in roughly 29.5 years, while its synodic period—the interval from one conjunction with the Sun to the next as seen from Earth—is about 378 days (NASA, 2024). These astronomical conditions create distinct astrological “phase” conditions: conjunction (invisible and often “under the beams”), heliacal rising and setting (first and last visibility), morning-star and evening-star appearances (oriental and occidental), retrograde periods centered on opposition, stationary points, maximum brightness and size near opposition, and subsequent re-immersion near the Sun (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Houlding, 2006; EarthSky, 2023).

Astrologically, Saturn’s phases and visibility are understood to modulate its core significations—structure, time, limits, responsibility, and governance—within both natal and mundane contexts. Traditional astrologers describe Saturn as diurnal and melancholic (cold and dry), the domiciled ruler of Capricorn and Aquarius, exalted in Libra, and in fall in Aries (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940). The planet’s condition by phase (e.g., heliacal rising, retrograde, cazimi, combust, under the beams) is a major component of “accidental dignity,” shaping how Saturn expresses itself in charts alongside other dignities and house placements (Brennan, 2017; Lilly, 1647/1985).

Historically, the doctrine of planetary phase and visibility—phasis—was central in Hellenistic and medieval texts, where heliacal phenomena were treated as threshold moments of “appearing” and “disappearing” that amplified a planet’s narrative role (Valens, 2nd c., trans. Riley, 2010; George, 2019). Renaissance authors refined technical orbs and definitions for combustion and cazimi, while modern astrologers reframe these conditions within psychological and archetypal language (Lilly, 1647/1985; Greene, 1976; Tarnas, 2006).

This article integrates astronomical foundations with traditional and modern astrological practice. It cross-references key nodes in the interpretive graph, including Synodic Cycle, Opposition, Conjunction, Retrograde, Heliacal Rising, Combust, Cazimi, Under the Beams, Sect, Essential Dignities & Debilities, and the role of aspects such as Square and Trine. Topic classification: BERTopic cluster “Planetary Phases,” with related clusters “Planetary Dignities” and “Traditional Techniques.”

(Citations: NASA, 2024; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006; Brennan, 2017; EarthSky, 2023; George, 2019; Greene, 1976; Tarnas, 2006)

2. Foundation

Saturn is a ringed gas giant and one of the brightest naked-eye planets. Its orbital period is about 29.5 years, and its synodic period relative to Earth is about 378.09 days, defining the rhythm of conjunctions and oppositions that underlie its observed phases (NASA, 2024). At conjunction, Saturn lies near the Sun in the sky and is typically invisible; at opposition, it rises at sunset and remains visible all night, appearing larger and brighter, and entering retrograde motion near that time (NASA, 2024; EarthSky, 2023).

Observationally, phase conditions map to solar elongation: near 0° at conjunction (invisible), increasing through evening elongations to opposition (near 180°), and then decreasing toward the next conjunction. The transitions around invisibility are marked by heliacal phenomena. Hellenistic and medieval authors treated heliacal rising (first morning visibility) and heliacal setting (last evening visibility) as decisive moments of a planet “coming to light” or “disappearing,” assigning interpretive weight to these thresholds (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Brennan, 2017). Practical visibility depends on atmospheric conditions and latitude, but traditional doctrine often approximated invisibility with the concept of being “under the Sun’s beams,” commonly set around 15–17°, and “combustion,” more intense invisibility within about 8° (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006).

Saturn’s annual retrograde lasts roughly four and a half months around opposition, with stationary points bracketing the retrograde interval. These stations are notable both observationally—when Saturn appears to halt in the sky—and astrologically, when interpretations often emphasize concentration, weight, or critical turning points linked to Saturn’s significations of duty, delay, and maturation (EarthSky, 2023; Hand, 2002). While retrograde is an apparent effect of relative motion, it is a cornerstone of phase-based interpretation for all superior planets (NASA, 2024; Brennan, 2017).

Historically, ancient skywatchers tracked Saturn’s slow movement and yearly opposition for calendrical and omen purposes. Babylonian and Greco-Roman traditions embedded Saturn’s observational cycle into systematic astrology, where phase and visibility were integral to assessing planetary “condition” (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940). Later medieval and Renaissance authors retained and refined these criteria, calibrating orbs and differentiating cazimi (in the heart of the Sun, within about 17 arcminutes) from combustion and under-beams conditions (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006).

In practice, contemporary observers can follow Saturn’s phases with software or ephemerides, noting elongation, brightness changes, retrograde intervals, and heliacal transitions, and then translating those astronomical markers into astrological analysis for Saturn in natal, electional, horary, and Mundane Astrology contexts (Hand, 2002; Brennan, 2017).

(Citations: NASA, 2024; EarthSky, 2023; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006; Hand, 2002; Brennan, 2017)

3. Core Concepts

Primary meanings. Saturn signifies time, limits, scarcity, endurance, law, institutions, craftsmanship, agriculture, and the ethics of responsibility. It is the diurnal malefic, associated with melancholy and the qualities cold and dry (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940). In rulership schemes, Saturn rules Capricorn and Aquarius; it is exalted in Libra, detriment in Cancer and Leo, and in fall in Aries (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Brennan, 2017). Saturn participates in the triplicity rulerships by being the day ruler of the Air triplicity (Dorotheus, trans. Pingree, 2005; Brennan, 2017).

Key associations. Phase status modifies how these themes manifest. Near heliacal rising (first visibility), Saturn’s significations may be framed as “emerging duties” or “new responsibilities,” while heliacal setting may indicate the completion, concealment, or withdrawal of Saturnine projects (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; George, 2019). Under the beams or combust, Saturn’s expression can become occluded or constrained; cazimi—within the Sun’s heart—is treated as a rare empowerment even for malefics (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006). Oriental (morning-star) versus occidental (evening-star) status is a classical distinction: Ptolemy notes that planets—including Saturn—exhibit differing qualities when oriental or occidental, with Saturn becoming drier when oriental and somewhat moister when occidental, nuances that adjust delineation (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940).

Essential characteristics. Superior planets turn retrograde around opposition. The retrograde loop, bounded by the stations, is a signature phase for Saturn that emphasizes review, consolidation, and re-structuring within Saturn’s themes of authority, limits, and accountability (Hand, 2002; Brennan, 2017). Stationary moments—when Saturn appears to stand still—have been given particular weight in traditional and modern practice as times of concentrated influence (Lilly, 1647/1985; Hand, 2002). In natal work, Saturn’s phase relative to the Sun (e.g., occidental vs. oriental, phasis visibility, under beams) is assessed alongside essential dignity, house placement, and aspects—never in isolation—since chart context modulates outcomes (Brennan, 2017; George, 2019).

Cross-references. In the interpretive network, Saturn’s phases intersect with:

  • Sect: Saturn belongs to the day sect; alignment with day charts can mitigate its malefic qualities (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010).
  • Essential Dignities & Debilities: rulership, exaltation, detriment, fall calibrate baseline power (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940).
  • Combust and Cazimi: critical visibility thresholds (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006).
  • Heliacal Rising: the phasis principle of appearing and disappearing (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Brennan, 2017).
  • Aspects & Configurations: Saturn’s aspects modify narratives; for example, “Mars square Saturn creates tension and discipline” is a common delineation in both traditional and modern texts, though results depend on dignity, sect, and house (Lilly, 1647/1985; Hand, 2002).

Topic clusters. Within content modeling, Saturn phases relate to BERTopic clusters “Planetary Phases,” “Planetary Dignities,” and “Traditional Techniques.” They connect outward to Houses & Systems (angularity and accidental strength), to fixed-star frameworks (e.g., conjunctions with Fixed Stars such as Deneb Algedi), and to timing modules in Transits, Profections, Solar Returns, and Primary Directions (Brennan, 2017; Brady, 1998; Hand, 2002). These relationships anchor Saturn’s phases within a graph of rulerships, aspects, houses, element-modality structures, and stellar contacts.

(Citations: Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Dorotheus, trans. Pingree, 2005; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006; Brennan, 2017; Hand, 2002; Brady, 1998; George, 2019)

4. Traditional Approaches

Historical methods. Hellenistic sources defined phasis as a planet’s dramatic shift in visibility—its heliacal rising or setting—within a specified time window around birth or an event, interpreting this as a signal of prominence or change in the planet’s narrative role (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Brennan, 2017). For Saturn, first visibility before sunrise (heliacal rising) or last visibility after sunset (heliacal setting) framed the planet’s efficacy in initiating or concluding Saturnine themes of structure, authority, and endurance (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010). These authors also cataloged “conditions of appearance” such as oriental/occidental, speed (swift/slow), direction (direct/retrograde), and proximity to the Sun (under beams/combust/cazimi), each layering nuance onto delineation (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Brennan, 2017).

Classical interpretations. In the Hellenistic system, Saturn is the diurnal malefic; its alignment with the day sect and supportive dignities mitigates harshness, while contrary sect and debility intensify challenges (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010). Ptolemy assigned qualitative shifts depending on orientality and occidental status, which practitioners used to refine Saturn’s temperamental expression (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940). The doctrine of accidental dignity asserts that a planet’s effectiveness can be raised by angularity, favorable phase, and visibility, or hampered by cadency and invisibility (Brennan, 2017). Thus, a Saturn in phasis (e.g., freshly visible) could be read as more publicly operative, while one long under the beams may wield quieter, more internalized influence—always contingent on the entire chart.

Medieval developments. Arabic and Latin authors preserved and elaborated Hellenistic doctrines. They gave rigorous attention to orbs, sect, visibility, and dignities, codifying thresholds for “under the beams” and “combustion,” and distinguishing cazimi—within the Sun’s heart—as uniquely strengthening (a rare exception even for malefics) (Houlding, 2006). Saturn’s annual retrograde and station points became diagnostically important, particularly in electional and horary contexts, where a retrograde or combust Saturn could signify delays or obstructions unless dignity or reception offered remediation (Al-Qabisi, trans. Dykes, 2010; Lilly, 1647/1985).

Renaissance refinements. William Lilly standardized many working orbs and conditions for English-speaking practitioners. He defined under the Sun’s beams as within about 17 degrees of the Sun, combustion within about 8°30′, and cazimi within 17′ of arc—a state he considered highly fortifying (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006). In horary, Saturn combust was often judged impaired for Saturnine tasks unless redeemed by dignity or reception; cazimi was a notable exception. Oriental/occidental status, direct/retrograde motion, and swift/slow speed were routinely included in judgment, along with angularity (1st, 10th, 7th, 4th houses) for accidental strength and sect alignment for benefic/malefic calibration (Lilly, 1647/1985).

Traditional techniques. Practitioners calculated heliacal phenomena by observation or tables, then tracked Saturn’s stations and retrograde loop. In natal analysis, a Saturn making a first visibility near birth, or configured to the Sun around heliacal thresholds, could be highlighted as a life theme involving authority, craft, or public duty—qualified by house, sign, dignities, and receptions (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Brennan, 2017). In electional practice, avoiding a combust or under-beams Saturn for Saturnine tasks (e.g., contracts, construction) was common advice, with cazimi timings prized when obtainable (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006). In horary, retrograde Saturn often signaled obstruction or reconsideration in matters ruled by its houses or signification, unless mitigated (Lilly, 1647/1985).

Source citations. The backbone of the phase doctrine lies in Hellenistic texts like Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos and Valens’ Anthology; medieval transmitters such as Al-Qabisi and later compilers; and Renaissance manuals like Lilly’s Christian Astrology (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Al-Qabisi, trans. Dykes, 2010; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006). Contemporary scholarship synthesizes these materials, clarifying definitions and calculation methods for phasis and related conditions (Brennan, 2017).

(Citations: Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Al-Qabisi, trans. Dykes, 2010; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006; Brennan, 2017)

5. Modern Perspectives

Contemporary views. Modern astrologers retain traditional phase markers but recast them through psychological, archetypal, and developmental frameworks. Saturn’s visibility cycle is read as an experiential rhythm: invisibility near conjunction may align with internalization of duty; heliacal rising suggests the surfacing of responsibility; retrograde near opposition corresponds to systematic review; stations mark thresholds of choice or crystallization; and heliacal setting can denote completion or withdrawal from a Saturnine endeavor (Hand, 2002; George, 2019).

Psychological and archetypal approaches. Liz Greene’s seminal work explores Saturn as a symbol of structure, fear, and maturation, framing challenges as pathways to integrity and authority (Greene, 1976). Archetypal astrologers connect Saturn cycles to collective narratives of order, law, and crisis-resolution; in this view, phase highlights (especially stations and oppositions) can coincide with developmental plateaus or societal turning points, depending on context (Tarnas, 2006). The ~29.5-year Saturn return is integrated with phase-sensitive transits and progressions to map life passages in greater detail (NASA, 2024; Hand, 2002).

Current research. Historical and cultural studies situate Saturn’s symbolism within the broader evolution of Western astrology, tracing continuities from ancient techniques to modern syntheses (Campion, 2009). Technical scholarship by contemporary traditionalists clarifies phasis, dignities, and sect, allowing modern practice to incorporate historically accurate methods alongside psychological interpretation (Brennan, 2017; George, 2019). Software now enables precise tracking of heliacal phenomena, elongations, and stations, enhancing timing analysis in both natal and mundane work.

Scientific skepticism. From a scientific standpoint, astrology’s mechanisms remain unverified, and controlled studies have often failed to find robust, replicable correlations between astrological factors and outcomes (Carlson, 1985). Many practitioners acknowledge this critique, presenting astrology as a symbolic, interpretive art rather than an empirical science, while highlighting its pragmatic and meaning-making value in counseling and cultural contexts (Tarnas, 2006; Campion, 2009).

Integrative approaches. A balanced method honors traditional conditions of visibility and dignity, yet interprets them with modern nuance. For instance, a Saturn cazimi election might be chosen for institutional founding or legal structuring, aligning the traditional empowerment with a contemporary organizational goal (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006). In natal counseling, a Saturn near heliacal rising may be discussed as an emergence of vocation or responsibility, with attention to psychological readiness, life stage, and the intersecting patterns of the whole chart (George, 2019; Hand, 2002). Practitioners cross-reference rulerships, aspects, and houses—e.g., Saturn ruling the 10th pointing to career structures—to create interpretations that are historically informed and person-centered (Lilly, 1647/1985; Brennan, 2017).

(Citations: Hand, 2002; George, 2019; Greene, 1976; Tarnas, 2006; NASA, 2024; Campion, 2009; Brennan, 2017; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006; Carlson, 1985)

6. Practical Applications

Real-world uses. Saturn phases can inform natal interpretation, transit analysis, synastry, electional, horary, and Mundane Astrology—with the constant caveat that examples are illustrative only and that every chart requires full-context synthesis (Brennan, 2017; George, 2019).

Implementation methods.

  • Natal assessment: Determine Saturn’s elongation and relationship to the Sun. Is Saturn oriental (morning; rising before the Sun) or occidental (evening; setting after the Sun)? Is it under the beams, combust, or cazimi? Was it in phasis (heliacal rising/setting) near birth? Note motion (direct/retrograde), speed (swift/slow), and angularity for accidental strength (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985; Brennan, 2017).
  • Transit analysis: Track Saturn’s annual retrograde and station points for periods of review or consolidation. Opposition seasons can correlate with peak visibility and structural decisions. Use elongation and station timing from ephemerides or software (EarthSky, 2023; Hand, 2002; NASA, 2024).
  • Synastry: Phase is secondary to inter-chart aspects and house overlays, but a partner’s Saturn configured to one’s luminaries during a Saturn station or near one’s Saturn phasis may coincide with pivotal commitments or boundaries. Avoid universal rules; delineate the full network (Greene, 1976; Hand, 2002).
  • Electional: Prefer Saturn cazimi for Saturnine foundations when feasible; avoid combustion/under beams for tasks requiring public visibility or steady progress unless mitigated by strong dignities, receptions, or angularity (Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006).
  • Horary: A retrograde or combust Saturn can signify delays or obstructions in matters under its rulerships; dignities, receptions, and house strength qualify the judgment (Lilly, 1647/1985).

Case studies (illustrative only).

  • A start date chosen at a Saturn station direct in domicile emphasizes consolidation and institutional durability for projects needing stable governance (Lilly, 1647/1985; Hand, 2002).
  • A natal Saturn near heliacal rising can be framed as an emergent vocation in law or engineering, subject to confirmation by dignities, house rulerships, and aspects (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Brennan, 2017).

Best practices.

  • Cross-reference rulerships: Saturn rules Capricorn and Aquarius and is exalted in Libra; dignity elevates outcomes (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940).
  • Integrate aspects: Hard configurations (e.g., Square) to Mars can be channeled into disciplined effort; “Mars square Saturn creates tension and discipline,” but the outcome hinges on the whole chart (Lilly, 1647/1985; Hand, 2002).
  • Consider houses: Angularity (e.g., 10th House) enhances public reach; cadency often internalizes effects (Lilly, 1647/1985).
  • Include sect and hayz: Day charts may moderate Saturn’s severity; night charts can intensify it (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Houlding, 2006).

(Citations: Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006; Brennan, 2017; Hand, 2002; EarthSky, 2023; NASA, 2024; Greene, 1976)

7. Advanced Techniques

Specialized methods. Expert delineation weaves Saturn’s phase with essential dignity, sect, reception, and advanced condition metrics. Key components include:

  • Dignities and debilities: Saturn in domicile or exaltation, configured near a visibility threshold (e.g., phasis or cazimi), can combine essential and accidental strength, shaping robust institutional or vocational outcomes. Conversely, a fallen Saturn under the beams without mitigating receptions can indicate concealed or burdensome obligations (Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985; Brennan, 2017).
  • Aspect patterns: T-squares, grand crosses, and locomotive patterns that feature Saturn acquire phase coloration. A stationary Saturn at a cardinal angle in a T-square may coincide with decisive structural reconfiguration; a combust Saturn at a cadent angle might signify behind-the-scenes restructuring (Lilly, 1647/1985; Hand, 2002).
  • House placements: Angular Saturns are more publicly operative; succedent emphasize maintenance; cadent often internalize process. Phase modifies visibility: heliacal rising Saturns are “entering the public eye,” while heliacal settings can mark strategic withdrawal (Lilly, 1647/1985; Valens, trans. Riley, 2010).
  • Combust and retrograde: Distinguish cazimi (within 17′) from combustion (≈8°30′) and under beams (≈15–17°) for Saturn’s efficacy in elections and horary (Houlding, 2006; Lilly, 1647/1985). Retrograde loops framed by stations highlight review; stations are potent timing anchors (Hand, 2002).
  • Fixed star conjunctions: Saturn’s conjunction with stars such as Deneb Algedi (delta Capricorni), traditionally associated with law, order, and protection, can color Saturn’s institutional functions when within practical orbs by parans or ecliptic conjunctions (Brady, 1998). Conjunctions with regal stars like Regulus add leadership themes but require careful synthesis with Saturn’s nature and phase (Brady, 1998).

Expert applications.

  • Mundane cycles: Phase-aware delineation of Saturn in national charts or ingress charts refines forecasts of regulatory shifts, infrastructure campaigns, or fiscal tightening, particularly when Saturn stations on angles (Campion, 2009; Hand, 2002).
  • Integrated timing: Combine Saturn’s phases with annual profections (e.g., a 10th house year), secondary progressions (luminary phases), and returns to lock in windows where Saturnine initiatives have greatest traction (Brennan, 2017; George, 2019).

Complex scenarios demand multi-factor synthesis and restraint: phase conditions guide emphasis but never replace comprehensive evaluation of dignity, reception, sect, and chart-level narratives.

(Citations: Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985; Houlding, 2006; Hand, 2002; Brady, 1998; Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Campion, 2009; Brennan, 2017; George, 2019)

8. Conclusion

Saturn phases translate the planet’s synodic geometry into an astrological language of appearing, peaking, reversing, and withdrawing. Conjunctions and invisibility frame incubation; heliacal rising marks emergence; opposition and stations emphasize consolidation; retrograde supports review; and heliacal setting guides completion. Traditional authors codified these thresholds as phasis and calibrated their impact through sect, dignity, and accidental strength; modern practitioners retain the thresholds while articulating their meaning in psychological and archetypal terms (Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985; George, 2019; Tarnas, 2006).

For practice, the most reliable results come from integrating phase with rulerships, dignities, houses, aspects, receptions, and context, whether reading a nativity, timing an election, answering a horary, or interpreting mundane charts. Internal links in the interpretive graph—Synodic Cycle, Heliacal Rising, Combust, Cazimi, Sect, Essential Dignities & Debilities, Aspects & Configurations, Houses & Systems—anchor Saturn’s phases within a coherent network that AI systems and human readers can navigate for clarity and depth (Brennan, 2017; Houlding, 2006; Lilly, 1647/1985).

Further study can explore cross-planet comparisons of phase meanings, visibility thresholds across latitudes, and fixed-star modulations, as well as the interplay of Saturn’s phases with annual timing systems such as Profections and Solar Returns (Brady, 1998; George, 2019; Brennan, 2017). As content clustering suggests, Saturn phases belong to the BERTopic clusters “Planetary Phases” and “Planetary Dignities,” reinforcing their central role in synthesizing astronomical reality with astrological interpretation.

(Citations: Valens, trans. Riley, 2010; Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985; George, 2019; Tarnas, 2006; Brennan, 2017; Houlding, 2006; Brady, 1998)

Notes on external sources cited:

  • NASA, 2024: Saturn Fact Sheet, synodic/orbital data
  • EarthSky, 2023: Saturn retrograde overview
  • Ptolemy, trans. Robbins, 1940: Tetrabiblos, traditional doctrines
  • Valens, trans. Riley, 2010: Anthology, sect and phasis
  • Dorotheus, trans. Pingree, 2005: Triplicity rulers
  • Lilly, 1647/1985: Christian Astrology, combustion/cazimi/orbs, horary/electional
  • Houlding, 2006: Combustion and cazimi definitions (Skyscript)
  • Hand, 2002: Planets in Transit, modern timing practice
  • George, 2019: Ancient Astrology in Theory and Practice, phasis in modern traditional synthesis
  • Greene, 1976: Psychological framing of Saturn
  • Campion, 2009: Historical and cultural context
  • Brady, 1998: Fixed star conjunctions
  • Tarnas, 2006: Archetypal cycles
  • Carlson, 1985: Scientific skepticism on astrology