Purple candle
• 14 min read

Relocation Charts

Relocation Charts

wiki

Relocation Charts

1. Introduction

Relocation charts are recalculated natal charts cast for a different geographic place than the birth location, used to examine how planetary angularity and house emphasis may express when a person lives in or visits that new locale. In contemporary practice, they are a core method within astrocartography and geodetic/location-based work, complementing planetary line mapping and local horizon techniques to evaluate place-specific potentials and challenges (Lewis & Irving, 1997; Davis, 2006). While the zodiacal longitudes of planets remain the same as in the natal chart, the Ascendant, Midheaven, and houses shift according to the new latitude and longitude, reframing topics and life areas emphasized “on the ground” (Houlding, 1996; Brennan, 2017).

Historically, astrologers have been attentive to the role of place in nativities, returns, and mundane charts, though the systematic practice of casting a “relocated natal” is a modern development. Jim Lewis formalized large-scale planetary line mapping, branded AstroCartoGraphy, which plots where planets would be angular worldwide and provides a travel and relocation framework often interpreted alongside relocated charts (Lewis & Irving, 1997; Astrocartography overview: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrocartography). In parallel, Martin Davis and others articulated a comprehensive “astrolocality” toolkit that includes relocation, local space, and paran-based star work (Davis, 2006; Erlewine, 1978/2008).

The significance of relocation charts lies in their practical, experiential focus: they help practitioners consider how a constant natal promise might manifest differently across locations, thereby supporting decisions about moving, study abroad, sabbaticals, or extended travel. Angularity and house changes become the principal interpretive levers, while natal dignities, aspects, and timing techniques remain fundamental context (Houlding, 1996; Lilly, 1647/1985).

Key concepts introduced here include recalculation of angles and houses at a new place; integration with planetary line methods in Astrocartography; the role of house systems from Houses & Systems (e.g., whole sign vs. quadrant); and the interpretive emphasis on angular strength from Angularity & House Strength. Related relationships—such as essential dignities (e.g., “Mars rules Aries and Scorpio, is exalted in Capricorn”)—continue to inform delineation across locations (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Houlding, 2000). For illustration only, one might note that “Mars square Saturn creates tension and discipline,” yet any example is not a universal rule and requires whole-chart context (Lilly, 1647/1985). This article situates relocation charts within geographic astrology, cross-referencing Essential Dignities & Debilities, Aspects & Configurations, and fixed stars to anchor a reliable interpretive approach (Brady, 1998).

(Word count: 350)

2. Foundation

Relocation charts rest on a straightforward astronomical-reckoning principle: the planets’ zodiacal positions for the birth moment remain unchanged, but the local horizon and meridian depend on place. Thus, for a given universal time, changing the latitude and longitude produces a different Ascendant–Descendant axis, Midheaven–IC axis, and house framework. This yields a chart that answers “what is emphasized here?” rather than altering the natal promise itself (Davis, 2006; Houlding, 1996).

Calculation proceeds as follows. First, retain the exact birth time in UTC (or convert to UTC), then replace the birth coordinates with the target location’s coordinates. Recompute the Ascendant and Midheaven, and derive houses according to the chosen system (e.g., Placidus, Whole Sign, Equal). Most software supports “relocation” functionality, and platforms such as Astrodienst outline procedures and cautions for interpretation (Astrodienst Help, Relocation; https://www.astro.com/faq/fq_fh_reloc_e.htm). While the technical underpinnings are astronomical, interpretive logic remains astrological: assess angularity, house rulerships from the relocated Ascendant, and the topical re-assignment of planets now inhabiting different houses (Houlding, 1996; Brennan, 2017).

Angularity is crucial. Traditional authors emphasize the power of planets on angles, treating them as “loud” or “operative” regardless of sign condition. Ptolemy and later William Lilly both underline the strength conferred by angular placement, a principle that becomes central in relocation work when a previously cadent natal planet becomes angular in a new place (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985). In practice, relocation charts are often read with the same house significations as natal charts, but weighted for local emphasis (see House Associations and Angularity & House Strength). The natal dignities—domicile, exaltation, detriment, and fall—remain unchanged, preserving essential condition even as accidental strength varies by location (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Houlding, 2000).

Relocation is best understood alongside allied geographic techniques. AstroCartoGraphy maps show where planets would be angular globally; Local Space charts show azimuthal vectors radiating from a point to highlight directions of planetary emphasis; paran techniques examine planet–star angular crossings at a latitude (Lewis & Irving, 1997; Erlewine, 1978/2008; Brady, 1998). Within a comprehensive framework of Relocation Astrology, the relocated natal supplies chart-level nuance to the “where” indicated by line maps. Each technique contributes a distinct lens; together they support evidence-based decisions about residence, work, and travel, with the caveat that individual outcomes vary and all interpretation must consider the full chart and timing context (Davis, 2006; Brennan, 2017).

(Word count: 451)

3. Core Concepts

Primary meanings. A relocation chart is the natal chart “re-anchored” to a different place. The zodiacal longitudes and planetary aspects do not change; what changes are the angles and the house placements. Therefore, the principal interpretive levers are: (1) angularity shifts (e.g., a planet becomes conjunct the relocated Ascendant), (2) house changes (a planet moves from natal 6th to relocated 10th), and (3) derived rulerships from the relocated Ascendant and Midheaven (Houlding, 1996; Davis, 2006). The natal promise—essential dignity, overall condition, and natal configurations—remains foundational and is not negated by relocation (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985).

Key associations. Angular planets grow more prominent; succedent planets moderate; cadent planets quiet—this classical hierarchy often frames relocation interpretation (see Angularity & House Strength). For career-oriented moves, emphasis on the relocated 10th house or MC contacts is significant; for partnership goals, the 7th and Descendant axis; for study and travel, the 9th; for home life, the 4th (Houlding, 1996). Planetary rulerships continue to matter: for example, Mars rules Aries and Scorpio and is exalted in Capricorn, so when Mars becomes angular at a location, topics linked to its rulership and essential dignity can be foregrounded there (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Houlding, 2000). Likewise, aspect dynamics carry through; a Mars square Saturn will still mark tension that may externalize more visibly where either planet is angular, often bringing a challenging form of productivity or discipline (Lilly, 1647/1985).

Essential characteristics. Relocation charts are interpretive overlays, not new identities. Practitioners typically read them as “how the natal expresses here,” integrating transits, progressions, and time-lord techniques against the relocated angles, especially for extended stays and residence (Davis, 2006; Brennan, 2017). Short trips may reflect transient activation, more akin to a locational transit effect, while long-term residence allows angular and house emphases to root behaviorally and circumstantially. The choice of house system (e.g., Whole Sign vs. Placidus) can visibly alter some house placements; the interpretive philosophy of the practitioner therefore matters (Brennan, 2017; Houlding, 1996). See Houses & Systems for comparative implications.

Cross-references. Relocation integrates naturally with Astrocartography maps, where AC/MC/DC/IC lines signal the same angularity shifts the relocated chart displays at a point (Lewis & Irving, 1997). Local Space vectors can be combined with relocation to choose neighborhoods or directions within a city that align with desired planetary emphasis (Erlewine, 1978/2008). Fixed stars add another layer: if a location places the Sun, Moon, or angles near a notable star—e.g., Regulus—some practitioners consider the star’s paran or conjunction symbolism part of the local signature (Brady, 1998). Elemental and modal balances—Fire signs (Aries, Leo, Sagittarius), Earth (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn), Air (Gemini, Libra, Aquarius), Water (Cancer, Scorpio, Pisces)—remain natal facts but might be emphasized by house prominence at a location (Ptolemy, trans. 1940). This article relates to the topic modeling cluster for “Relocation Astrology and Astrocartography,” and intersects with clusters on “Planetary Dignities” and “Angularity,” reflecting its graph relationships to rulerships, aspects, and house strength within our knowledge base.

Finally, examples in this topic are illustrative only, not universal rules. Every chart demands holistic analysis and careful attention to life context and timing. Statements about placements, such as “Mars in the 10th house affects career and public image,” denote potential tendencies moderated by dignity, aspects, sect, and the rest of the chart (Houlding, 1996; Lilly, 1647/1985).

(Word count: 558)

4. Traditional Approaches

While the modern relocation chart is a 20th-century formalization, the traditional record shows consistent attention to place, angularity, and the casting of charts for where an event or return occurs. Hellenistic sources treat angular strength as a principal factor in eminence and visibility, a doctrine that relocation relies upon when reframing planets to new angles (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Valens, trans. Riley 2010). For example, Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos emphasizes the primacy of angles and the topical hierarchy of houses, anchoring the logic that a planet brought to the Ascendant or Midheaven becomes more operative (Ptolemy, trans. 1940). This is the same underlying rationale used by geographic astrologers when interpreting an angular planet at a new locale.

Medieval authors advanced place-sensitive practices through timing charts. Abu Ma’shar and the Perso-Arabic tradition cast solar revolutions (solar returns), often for the location of residence at the time of the return, to assess the year’s themes—demonstrating that traditional astrology considered the immediate place in which a chart “lands” (Abu Ma’shar, trans. Dykes 2010). Guido Bonatti’s Liber Astronomiae, influential in medieval Europe, likewise treats revolutions and the strength of planets by house and angle as determinant of outcomes for the native’s year, implying practical concern with where the chart is cast and angular testimony (Bonatti, trans. Dykes 2007). In horary and elections, William Lilly reiterated classical rules of angular strength and accidental dignities, underscoring a bedrock traditional premise adopted by relocation work: angles “speak loudest” (Lilly, 1647/1985).

Star lore also tied celestial factors to geography via parans—the simultaneous rising, setting, culminating, or anti-culminating of stars and planets—known in various ancient traditions. Modern fixed-star practice, particularly in the work of Bernadette Brady, develops paran analysis for latitude-specific expressions, offering a location-based rationale with classical antecedents (Brady, 1998). Although Hellenistic and medieval sources did not compute “relocated natals” in the contemporary sense, their emphasis on angularity, house topics, returns, and star–place relationships provides conceptual continuity with modern relocation (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Abu Ma’shar, trans. Dykes 2010; Bonatti, trans. Dykes 2007).

The Renaissance period further systematized return techniques and mundane approaches. Lilly’s Christian Astrology codified interpretive rules for houses, aspects, and angularity that remain central when a planet becomes angular through relocation (Lilly, 1647/1985). Traditional tables of essential dignities—domicile, exaltation (e.g., Mars exalted in Capricorn), detriment, and fall—were—and remain—reference points for weighing how loudly and effectively a planet can act when made angular at a new location (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Houlding, 2000). The doctrine of reception, triplicity, and sect can all be integrated when evaluating whether a newly angular planet will express smoothly or contentiously in that place (Lilly, 1647/1985; Brennan, 2017).

The explicit idea of drawing global planetary lines to guide travel and residence emerged in the modern era. Sepharial’s early-20th-century “geodetic” correspondences mapped longitude and zodiac for mundane analysis, anticipating later geographic methods (Sepharial, 1917). In the late 20th century, Jim Lewis developed AstroCartoGraphy, registering the system and popularizing the combined use of planetary angular lines and relocated charts to offer practical guidance for real-world decisions (Lewis & Irving, 1997; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrocartography). Martin Davis’s “astrolocality” framework further integrated Local Space and parans into a coherent practice set (Davis, 2006; Erlewine, 1978/2008). Thus, traditional methods supply the interpretive spine—angularity, houses, dignities, reception—while modern geographic tools supply the spatial scaffolding.

In sum, pre-modern authors did not cast “relocated natal charts” as a distinct genre, but they bequeathed the logic that makes relocation coherent: place-sensitive angularity, robust house doctrine, and yearly charts cast for where the native actually is. Contemporary relocation inherits and applies those principles to living maps and city-level choices (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Abu Ma’shar, trans. Dykes 2010; Lilly, 1647/1985; Lewis & Irving, 1997).

(Word count: 670)

5. Modern Perspectives

Contemporary relocation practice is integrative. Astrologers typically synthesize the relocated natal chart with planetary line maps (ACG), Local Space vectors, and fixed-star parans to form a location narrative that aligns with the natal promise and the person’s aims (Lewis & Irving, 1997; Davis, 2006; Brady, 1998; Erlewine, 1978/2008). For example, an individual seeking career visibility might examine cities on a Sun or Jupiter MC line, then compare the relocated chart to see whether the Sun or Jupiter becomes tightly angular and whether 10th-house topics are reinforced by sign and rulership in that locale. This modular approach allows practitioners to compare multiple candidate cities with a consistent set of criteria.

Psychological and humanistic approaches emphasize the developmental possibilities of changing context. In these views, relocation does not “change who you are” but offers conditions in which certain natal potentials may be more readily expressed—especially where angular planets become “louder.” Modern delineations often incorporate counseling sensibilities, referencing transits and progressions to the relocated angles to time “windows” of opportunity for moves, sabbaticals, or creative residencies (Brennan, 2017; Davis, 2006). Within that framework, general maxims such as “Mars square Saturn creates tension and discipline” are treated as process descriptions, not deterministic outcomes, and require full-chart synthesis including dignity, sect, and house topics (Lilly, 1647/1985).

From a research and evidence standpoint, astrology’s empirical status remains contested. The double-blind Carlson test reported results consistent with chance for certain astrological claims, fueling ongoing debate about methodology and what constitutes astrological evidence (Carlson, 1985). Practitioners often respond that qualitative, idiographic assessment, longitudinal case work, and client feedback better reflect the nature of astrological inquiry, while still advocating clear hypotheses and ethical communication about uncertainty. In relocation specifically, some contemporary astrologers track client-reported outcomes after moves or extended travel to refine interpretive heuristics (Davis, 2006; Lewis & Irving, 1997). Readers should note that examples are illustrative only; no single factor or location guarantees specific results.

Integrative approaches combine traditional and modern tools. A widely used workflow: identify promising regions via ACG lines; refine city choices with Local Space directionality and star parans; cast relocation charts for short-listed cities; weigh essential dignities, reception, and angularity; overlay transits and progressions to relocated angles for timing; and, where relevant, compare solar returns cast for the intended residence (Lewis & Irving, 1997; Brady, 1998; Erlewine, 1978/2008; Volguine, 1937/1994). This workflow respects traditional technique while leveraging modern cartographic visualization. Cross-reference Astrocartography, Parallels & Contra-Parallels, Fixed Stars & Stellar Astrology, and Timing Techniques for a complete toolkit.

Modern software ecosystems have made relocation analysis accessible. Major platforms document calculation settings and interpretation cautions, emphasizing the importance of house system choice and accurate time-zone conversion (Astrodienst Help: https://www.astro.com/faq/fq_fh_reloc_e.htm). The field continues to evolve through practitioner exchange, conference case studies, and the synthesis of location data with timing techniques—an ongoing experiment in applying old principles to contemporary mobility.

(Word count: 560)

6. Practical Applications

Real-world uses. Relocation charts are deployed for residence moves, extended travel, academic sabbaticals, artist residencies, and seasonal work. The central objective is to align place with intention: for career visibility, emphasize MC/10th-house angularity; for partnership or client-facing roles, emphasize DSC/7th; for research and publishing, 9th; for home and rootedness, IC/4th (Houlding, 1996; Davis, 2006). Always integrate the natal promise and current timing; relocation amplifies what is natal, it does not manufacture entirely new potentials (Ptolemy, trans. 1940).

Implementation methods. A practical workflow includes:

1) Map candidate regions with ACG lines (e.g., Sun/Jupiter MC lines for leadership/expansion). 2) Cast relocation charts for short-listed cities. 3) Evaluate angular planets, house shifts, and relocated rulerships. 4) Check reception, essential dignity, sect, and aspects to the relocated angles. 5) Overlay transits and progressions to the relocated chart’s angles for move timing. 6) Optionally, assess Local Space directions within the city (Lewis & Irving, 1997; Erlewine, 1978/2008; Davis, 2006). Software help pages outline settings; see Astrodienst’s relocation guide (https://www.astro.com/faq/fq_fh_reloc_e.htm).

Case studies (illustrative only). Consider a native whose natal Venus is succedent but becomes conjunct the relocated MC in City A: thematic expectations might include public visibility in Venusian domains—arts, diplomacy, or aesthetic branding—if Venus is well-dignified and supported by reception (Houlding, 2000). In City B, a natal Mars–Saturn square might become angular; the person may face demanding workloads or structured competitiveness that—if managed well—yield durable accomplishments (Lilly, 1647/1985). These are potentials, not guarantees. Full-chart synthesis and lived context are essential.

Best practices.

  • Verify birth time; small errors can shift angles significantly at some latitudes.
  • Use more than one technique: combine relocation, ACG, Local Space, and star parans for convergence.
  • Consider house system philosophy; compare Whole Sign with a quadrant system to see stable vs. sensitive factors (Brennan, 2017; Houlding, 1996).
  • Apply ethical communication: discuss ranges of expression, agency, and timing uncertainties.
  • Track outcomes post-move; feedback refines heuristics (Davis, 2006; Lewis & Irving, 1997).

Do not universalize examples. Statements such as “Mars in the 10th house affects career and public image” are general; actual expression depends on dignity, aspects, sect, profections, and transits (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985). Cross-reference Timing Techniques, Essential Dignities & Debilities, and Aspects & Configurations to contextualize any relocation judgment.

(Word count: 458)

7. Advanced Techniques

Specialized methods deepen place analysis when standard relocation and line mapping give mixed signals.

  • Local Space (azimuthal vectors). Plot planet lines as compass directions radiating from a location to select neighborhoods, travel bearings, or workspace orientation aligned with desired planetary qualities. This is particularly helpful after choosing a city, to fine-tune within-city placement (Erlewine, 1978/2008; Davis, 2006). See Specialized Topics: Local Space.
  • Parans and fixed stars. Star–planet parans are latitude-dependent angular crossings. If a location places the MC or Ascendant in paran with a star, its symbolism may “enter the room” there—e.g., Regulus with luminaries or angles can highlight leadership and honors, contingent on the natal promise (Brady, 1998). See Fixed Stars & Stellar Astrology.
  • Geodetic correspondences. A historical-modern hybrid assigns zodiac degrees to terrestrial longitudes, offering a mundane overlay that some practitioners use to contextualize relocation and ACG signals (Sepharial, 1917). Interpret geodetics cautiously and comparatively; corroboration with other techniques is recommended.
  • Declination parallels and contra-parallels. Traditional aspect doctrine includes parallels (same declination) and contra-parallels (opposite), which can act like conjunction/opposition modifiers. When planets that are parallel become angular in a relocation, their combined effect may be pronounced (Lilly, 1647/1985). See Parallels & Contra-Parallels.
  • CycloCartoGraphy and timing. Jim Lewis proposed timing overlays along planetary lines to identify periods when a given line’s symbolism may be more active, especially when synchronized with transits/progressions to relocated angles (Lewis & Irving, 1997). Combine with annual profections and solar returns cast for the residence at the birthday for a convergent timing picture (Abu Ma’shar, trans. Dykes 2010; Volguine, 1937/1994).

Expert application hinges on relationship mapping: rulership chains from the relocated Ascendant, reception networks, and essential dignity grant nuance about which angularized planets will deliver constructive outcomes. For example, “Mars rules Aries and Scorpio, is exalted in Capricorn” remains true everywhere, but how Mars acts when angular varies by dignity and reception at that location (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Houlding, 2000). As ever, examples are illustrative, not universal, and whole-chart context—including sect and condition—govern best practice.

(Word count: 350)

8. Conclusion

Relocation charts recast the natal sky onto new horizons, translating a constant planetary arrangement into place-specific priorities of angularity and houses. Woven with AstroCartoGraphy line maps, Local Space, and fixed-star parans, they form a coherent geographic astrology toolkit grounded in traditional principles of angular strength, essential dignity, and house doctrine (Ptolemy, trans. 1940; Lilly, 1647/1985; Lewis & Irving, 1997; Brady, 1998; Davis, 2006). The technique’s value lies not in replacing the natal, but in revealing where the natal’s potentials are more readily expressed.

Key takeaways for practitioners include: verify time and coordinates; compare multiple house systems to test stability; prioritize angularity shifts and relocated rulerships; integrate timing by transits, progressions, profections, and solar returns cast for the residence; and corroborate signals across relocation, ACG, Local Space, and parans. Maintain ethical, non-deterministic framing: examples are illustrative only; expression depends on full-chart context and lived circumstances (Houlding, 1996; Brennan, 2017).

For further study, see Astrocartography, Relocation Astrology, Houses & Systems, Angularity & House Strength, Fixed Stars & Stellar Astrology, and Timing Techniques. Methodological refinement continues as practitioners exchange case material and test integrative workflows. Future directions include richer mapping of star parans, improved software visualizations, and ongoing dialogue about evidence standards—qualitative and quantitative—appropriate to geographic astrology (Brady, 1998; Davis, 2006; Lewis & Irving, 1997). As a node in a broader graph of astrological relationships and topic clusters, relocation charts illustrate how technique, tradition, and place converge to inform practical decision-making in a mobile world.

(Word count: 250)

Internal cross-references used:

External sources cited contextually:

Note: Examples above are illustrative and not universal rules; every delineation depends on the full chart and context.